On Friday morning, Georgia began to recount the votes it received on November 3. However, within a short time, reports came in that the recount process was being conducted with as little respect for transparency as the original vote count. Without that transparency, this recount is a waste of taxpayer time and money.
Before getting to the problem with the recount itself, we need to be sure we're all on the same page about what's happening in Georgia, so some background is necessary. In my post about the two different types of election fraud, I explained that the first type of fraud goes to ballot legitimacy. That is, was the piece of paper that got fed into the counting machine from a duly registered voter? If not, that vote cannot be counted.
We know from the affidavits flooding in from across the country that the Democrats used the Wuhan virus to justify mailing out millions of ballots to anyone on the voter registers, whether that person had since died, moved on, or lost interest in voting. Because voter rolls are chock-full of such voters, mass mailings meant that thousand, tens of thousands, or even hundreds of thousands of ballots were floating around in mail-in states, free for anyone to grab and submit.
Democrats made this fraud possible because they have steadily chipped away at other election legitimacy gatekeepers, such as identification checks and signature matches. In Democrat-run states, voting became as easy and as vulnerable to fraud as going to a shopping mall, filling out names on slips of paper, and sticking them in a big bucket for a promotional "drawing" for a bike or car. Or, even better, mailing hundreds of completed slips of paper to your buddy at the car dealer for him to put in the bucket. That's how Democrat states ran their elections in 2020.
So here's what's important to know about Georgia's recount: the recount will do nothing to correct this first type of fraud. The process of vetting voters was wholly corrupt, and there is no way to disentangle the illegitimate from the legitimate ballots during the recount.
The second type of fraud involves counting. Data-crunchers have produced powerful evidence that electronic voting machines in contested states were set to switch votes from Trump to Biden. Jay Valentine has an accessible rundown of that type of fraud here. What's good about computer fraud is that, while it can be hidden on a small scale, on a large scale, it leaves unmistakable clues. There's strong evidence that the same pro-Biden code that showed up in Michigan also affected votes in Georgia.
In theory, while it won't winnow out illegitimate ballots, a hand recount will at least prevent a repeat of the computer counting fraud. However, that works only if the humans doing the counting don't cheat.
The best way to prevent humans from cheating is to watch them. Indeed, those of you old enough to remember the Florida recount in 2000 will also remember that the media wandered freely through the counting rooms, getting close-ups of people carefully examining each ballot for those infamous hanging chads. Everyone understood that the point was to get it right.
What happens, though, when the people in charge of the recount, in place of transparency, once again refuse to allow representatives of the parties to audit their work? What happens is this:
One of our observers at the hand count of the ballots ordered by Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. Does this inspire confidence? pic.twitter.com/jRoFCvqWoZ
Dick Morris explains that there is more going on than just barring Republicans from observing the vote. In addition, to the extent there are still available envelopes from the mailed in (absentee) ballots, secretary of state Brad Raffensperger stated that the counters would not attempt to match the signatures.
The refusal to check signatures or otherwise try to validate mail-in ballots has created hugely anomalous rejection rates. Typically, Georgia rejects 3.5% of absentee ballots because they cannot be validated. This year, says Morris, the rejection rate is 0.002%. As Morris said, with nothing more, that discrepancy points to vast fraud.
Not content with removing these fraud controls, Raffensberger also ordered the counties to finish the process by 3 P.M. on Saturday. Georgia received roughly 5 million votes. It's ludicrous to believe they can properly be recounted in one and a half days. This isn't a recount; it's fraud theater.
SOROS INVOLVED IN ELECTION THEFT
By Ethan Huff - distributednews.com
By now, you have probably heard all about the Dominion Voting Systems technology that was used to rig the election for Joe Biden. As it turns out, there is actually a second technology known as Smartmatic, backed by none other than George Soros, that was also used in some states to steal votes from President Trump.
Based out of the United Kingdom, Smartmatic is a Soros-linked foreign entity that currently provides voting technology in 16 American states, including the key battleground states of Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Virginia. It was formed in the year 2000 and was used several years later to rig the 2004 Venezuelan election for Hugo Chavez.
When Smartmatic was first incorporated, a Chavez campaign adviser was placed on the company's board, obviously for the purpose of scheming out how to use the system to produce a Chavez "win" four years later. Because this endeavor was a huge success, Smartmatic was then brought into the United States to bring about the same fraudulent results for Biden.
Lord Mark Malloch-Brown also sits on the board of Smartmatic, which is significant because he sits on the board of Soros' infamous Open Society Foundation. Malloch-Brown is also a key fixture in the British House of Lords, also known as the upper house of the Parliament of the U.K.
What this means is that the 2020 election, and possibly others, was run by George Soros and the British empire, at least in the states where Biden conveniently eked past Trump in the final hour thanks to hundreds of thousands of mystery votes that appeared out of nowhere.
Malloch-Brown, by the way, is also tied to the United Nations, where he worked as deputy secretary-general as well as chief of staff to Kofi Annan, whom we reported is a major funder of the so-called Global Fund, along with U2's Bono and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
To get an idea as to how Smartmatic voting technology may have been used to rig the 2020 election here in the U.S., it is necessary to look back at how it was used in Venezuela. What we know is that Chavez's "landslide" victory there was contingent upon a multi-million dollar contract that "came out of nowhere," ultimately leading to the destruction of Chavez's political opposition.
At the time, Smartmatic was claimed to be of American origin. However, its true owners appear to have been scattered all around the world, with a presence in The Netherlands, Barbados and even Venezuela itself. An official document revealed that "elite Venezuelans of several political strains" were "probably" involved in the creation of Smartmatic.
"The Smartmatic machines used in Venezuela are widely suspected of, though never proven conclusively to be, susceptible to fraud," this same document reveals. "The company is thought to be backing out of Venezuelan electoral events, focusing now on other parts of the world, including the United States via its subsidiary, Sequoia."
The owners of Smartmatic are said to have received a $200,000 equity investment from a Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (BRV) joint venture fund called FONCREI, which is directly tied to Chavez. Smartmatic is also linked to Dominion, it turns out, revealing an intricate web of corruption and fraud that has now infiltrated U.S. elections.
"Dominion is the name of the company involved in the recent U.S. elections," reports The Pan Am Post, citing information obtained from American Thinker. "Its name is associated with irregularities due to the failure of its electronic systems, whose technology was purchased from Smartmatic through its subsidiary Sequoia."
Dominion, of course, denies any such link. However, the company at one point allowed Smartmatic to market its same technology in other countries where Dominion does not do business, illustrating the type of collusion that is taking place between these two corrupt companies.
Dominion, by the way, is used in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania - all states where alleged voter fraud appears to have taken place. In the other key swing states whose elections are not controlled by Dominion, Smartmatic's software was apparently used instead.
"All those states have seen razor-thin margins in returns from the presidential election, which is officially undecided," writes Jim Hoft for The Gateway Pundit, noting that "impossible data ratios" were identified in Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin specifically.
Keep in mind that Dominion Voting Systems is also tied to Nancy Pelosi and Dianne Feinstein, two legacy Democrats with an extensive track record of corruption, and some might argue treason.
"As the Democrats are trying to turn the United States into Venezuela, the picture of the puzzle becomes [clearer] as it comes together," wrote one commenter at The Gateway Pundit, adding that the U.S. is "at a turning point" where if "the ship's course is not corrected ... we go down."
Another pointed out that Malloch-Brown's connection to Smartmatic is suspect and could point to MI6 involvement in the attempted theft of the 2020 presidential election. This could explain why Boris Johnson could not wait to congratulate Biden on his "win," referring to Trump as the "previous president" in a recent speech despite the fact that Trump is still the president until at least Jan. 20, 2021.
The 2020 election, despite the mainstream media's claims to the contrary, is far from over. As we learn more, we will share the latest developments with you at Trump.news.