The study of the effects of the cell phone's microwave transmission on the tissues of the body has been relatively brief, as the mass usage of cell phones has been a recent phenomenon. But much has indicated the danger of cell phone usage on living tissue even in that short span of time. It was talked about much more frequently in public forums such as newspapers and radio talk shows when the cell phone's popularity started to rise. Then suddenly, things got strangely silent. A good detective would suspect that the multi-billion dollar wireless industry was "somehow" capable of neutralizing the debate. So now you have everyone - including kids - sticking microwave boxes beside their skulls for several hours a week. And a coincident increase in cancer, which cell phone advocates dismiss with adjectives like "insignificant increase."
The cell phone industry and the globalist eugenics agenda behind it are deliberately making these mass killer devices cheap and commonly available, not unlike tobacco, knowing full well what will be the mass genocidal consequences. It is all being done by design, not by accident.
Notice how they have injected extensive, irritating and highly unnecessary cell phone use into most mass audience movies and tv shows today as well, in a sleazy ploy to manipulate everyone into using them as much as possible.
Cell phones were not developed to help anyone. They were put in place to ultimately destroy billions of human lives, while sold in the bogus sheepskin of a handy, affordable, seemingly harmless device, so nearly everyone would jump on board and become a habitual user.
The shameless cell phone industry, the health care establishment, and our lap-dog paid off media and congress are purposely glossing over these fatal truths, and going to the ends of the earth to hide them from the unsuspecting public.
"There is strong evidence that extreme low frequency (ELF) and radio frequency microwaves (RF/MW) are associated with accelerated aging, enhanced cell death and cancer, bad moods, depression, suicide, anger, rage and violence, primarily through alteration of cellular calcium ions and the melatonin/serotonin balance." - Dr. Neil Cherry, Lincoln University, New Zealand
Anyone who has taken the time to investigate this knows that cell phones fry your brain. The fact is that cell phones operate on a microwave bandwidth. Microwaves are used in broadcasting transmissions because microwaves pass easily through objects (buildings, mountains, etc.) with less interference than longer wavelengths. Try to imagine what they do to living tissue. Ham radio requires an operator to place his transmitting tower several yards away from any neighbor houses. The operator himself can be closer to the source of radiation, as he is in a "controlled RF" area, that is, he can control the transmission process. His neighbors are designated an "uncontrolled RF" area, in that they cannot control the radiation emanating from the tower. No such restrictions are put on cell phones, which emit similar amounts of radiation, and are pressed right against the head, obviously because it would ruin a multi-billion dollar business.
2mG (milli Gauss) is considered the safety limit by many scientists and Swedish authorities, above which health risks increase significantly. The FACT is that ELF output from the body of cell phones is 10-20 mG, and up to 50 mG!
Studies have shown that these 3 factors contribute to the ability of cell phone emissions to cause harm: Continuous Wave (CW) microwaves damage biological tissue. ELF-modulated microwaves damage biological tissue.
ELF FIELDS damage biological tissue. Dr. Lennart Hardell of Sweden found that right-handed people had a 2½ higher risk of a brain tumor in the right side of the brain, and left-handed people had nearly the same elevated risk of a left side brain tumor. The cell phone industry claims that "their products are safe" or "research indicates no health risk," and deceives the public. The ONLY statement that can be made is the opposite: that there is EXTENSIVE scientific evidence showing that cell phones DO carry health risks.
In order to avoid regulation by the FDA,the cellular industry agreed to create a thorough study to assure the public that cell phones were safe. In 1993 they hired Dr. George Carlo, a public health scientist, to spearhead what would eventually become a 6-year, $28.5 million research project. Rigorous checks and balances were implemented to guarantee that the findings from this project would be valid, and would stand up to the most rigid scrutiny. Ultimately, there were over 200 scientists and doctors from around the world that became involved, as well as the Harvard School of Public Health and the FDA. The expectation of everyone involved was that they were not going to find anything that would cause alarm. After 5 years of first designing and then implementing new testing procedures, however, alarming evidence began to emerge. Dr. Carlo's research showed several alarming signs: The human skull is penetrated deeply by the energy emitted from a cell phone. The blood brain barrier, which prevents invasion of the brain from toxins, can be compromised by the cell phone radiation and, most startling, that radio frequency radiation creates micronuclei in human blood cells, a type of genetic damage known to be a diagnostic marker for cancer. As little as 10 minutes on a cell phone can trigger changes in brain cells linked to cell division and cancer, suggests a new study conducted by researchers from the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel and published in the Biochemical Journal.
Here's how Dr. Carlo summed up his findings:
"The big picture is becoming disturbingly clear: there is a definite risk that the radiation plume that emanates from a cell phone antenna can cause cancer and other health problems."
Dr. George Carlo was head of research for the cellular industry from 1993-1999.
Dr. Carlo was dismissed from his position, and his funding removed by the cellular industry, after he released his official report documenting those findings, and appeared on several national television news programs, including ABC's 20/20, to discuss his study.
In addition to those discoveries, other health effects were also shown to have a connection with the use of cell phones, among them:
ALS (Lou Gehrig's Disease),
reduced sperm counts,
learning disabilities and behavioral problems in young children.
A recent study in Sweden showed evidence of people in rural areas having a higher chance of brain tumors from the higher radiation levels required to boost the cell phone signals for those rural dwellers. "We found that the risk of brain tumor was higher for people living in rural areas than in towns. The stronger the signal, the higher the risk," said Lennart Hardell, lead author of the study and a professor of oncology at University Hospital in Orebro.
The team monitored 1429 people with tumors, both malignant and benign and 1470 healthy people from various regions of Sweden. They determined that people who lived in rural areas and used a cell phone for at least three years were three times more likely to contract a brain tumor. If used it for 5 or more years, then your chances are quadrupled. The prospects don't look promising for a generation that is becoming more addicted to cell phones, use their cell phones virtually all the time, and seem not to care about the risks.
There has been evidence mounting for several years associating use of cell phones with brain cancers and other cancers, and it has been kept hidden from you. From police officers who use radar guns to heavy users of cellular phones who have contracted cancer, there has been mounting evidence that exposure to this kind of electromagnetic radiation is highly dangerous. A team of scientists funded by Telstra to investigate claimed links between cell phones and cancer has turned up probably the most significant finding of adverse health effects yet. When presented to 'Science' magazine for publication the study was rejected on the grounds that publication "would cause a panic". Three other prominent magazines including 'Nature' also later rejected the report, suggesting that they would not handle such important conclusions without the research being further confirmed.
The study looked at 200 mice, half exposed and half not, to pulsed digital phone radiation. The work was conducted at the Royal Adelaide Hospital by Dr Michael Repacholi, Professor Tony Basten, Dr Alan Harris and statistician Val Gebski, and it revealed a highly-significant doubling of cancer rates in the exposed group. The mice were subject to GSM-type pulsed microwaves at a power-density roughly equal to a cell-phone transmitting for two half-hour periods each day; this was pulsed transmission as from a handset, not the steady transmission of a cell-phone tower. A significant increase in B-cell lymphomas was evident early in the experiment, but the incidence continued to rise over the 18 months. The implications of the B-cell (rather than the normal T-cell) lymphomas here, is that B-cell effects are implicated in roughly 85 percent of all cancers. The experiment was conducted as a blind trial, using absolutely identical equipment and conditions for two groups of 100 mice. The only difference between handling the two groups was that the power to one antenna was never switched on. Over the 18 months, the exposed mice had 2.4-times the tumour rate of the unexposed - but this was later corrected downwards to a more confident 2-times claim to remove other possible influences.
According to Dr Alan Harris from the Walter and Eliza Institute in Melbourne: "This is important because up until this, there was no convincing evidence that radio fields (in contrast to X- and Gamma-rays, ultraviolet and atomic radiation) can directly cause the changes in genes responsible for cancer development." This experiment also raises questions about the potential for cell-phone handset radiation to effect people nearby (passive exposures) than just the user him or herself. Increased tumours began to be recorded after about 9 months. The total exposure period is very much less than can be expected from human use over a lifetime, so while one of the scientists downplayed the importance, saying, "humans are not rodents" another pointed out that "DNA is DNA".
Dr Henry Lai and Dr Singh at Washington State University reported enormous increases in double-strand DNA breaks in rat-brain tissue following cell-phone type microwave exposures of only two hours.
In 2008 the world's most comprehensive study of the health effect of cell phone use was released by The World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer. This was a 13-nation, 50-scientist collaboration. The intent was to define what, if any, risk of cancer comes from prolonged use of cell phones. It involved the pooled analysis of thousands of cases of tumours in the head and neck area: gliomas, meningiomas, acoustic neuromas and parotid gland tumors. Here's a look at some of the results that leaked:
A 2007 study conducted in five Northern European countries found a significantly increased risk of developing glioma after using a cell phone for more than 10 years. Glioma is a cancer of central nervous system cells, usually the brain.
A 2008 analysis of 10 European studies published since 2000 found a pattern of association between long-term cell phone use and a type of glioma and acoustic neuroma, a non-cancerous inner ear tumor.
A 2008 study showed heavy cell phone users had a 50% increased risk of developing a salivary gland tumor.
If you use a cordless phone, you're in the same danger as if you were using a cell phone. Cordless phones emit the same dangerous microwave radiation as cell phones.
The media, the government, and of course the cell phone industry all ignore these findings. The media is essentially silent on this issue now because they have been bought and paid for by the BIG money behind the cell phone industry. Every attempt has been made to hose down the significance of these reports, and others like them. However, the facts are CLEAR: that people have an increased risk of cancer from the use of cell phones, and there is a deliberate attempt by the industry, media, and government to keep people in the dark about this fact.